I'm a Dedicated Free-Market Advocate, But Medicare for All Represents the Best Hope for American Health System

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.

Patricia Harrison
Patricia Harrison

Financial analyst with over a decade of experience in international markets and investment advisory.