🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test recently following viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."